That was Greg's "if you take just one thing from this session" recommendation. Howard agreed, but added, "...equally promote having your researchers submit their funder information when submitting manuscripts for journal publication. Having the Researcher ID and Funder ID together married up to the article DOI is a powerful combination."
On the other hand, just having Howard & Greg chatting together on the same stage was a pretty powerful combination. When SHARE & CHORUS were first launched, just a few months after the Holdren memo was released, many observers saw them as competitive. In this corner, the publishing lobby making a policy end run to try to maintain their market dominance; and in this corner the combined might of the research libraries and universities seeking to leverage their investments in institutional repositories into some greater relevance. Which of these mutually exclusive solutions would the federal funding agencies settle on? (Or would PMC simply vacuum everything up into an expansive PubScience Central)?
Fortunately, it didn't take too long for the developers to see where the projects overlapped and where there were advantages to be gained for both projects by sharing expertise and perspectives. By the time I had lunch with several of my Roundtable colleagues at the AAAS meeting last February those conversations had gotten to the point where a joint appearance at Charleston was starting to look like a real possibility. I immediately thought of Greg as a potential participant. He's a Charleston regular and has been working with SHARE as a consultant. Turns out that he had been having discussions with Judy Ruttenberg about a similar panel proposal and when the Charleston directors got wind of all this, they put us together.
Bringing Howard in was a natural given his role with CHOR., and I wanted to include John Vaughn, whose experiences with handling scholarly commnications issues for the AAU go back many years, and whose roles in chairing the Roundtable and in helping to develop the SHARE concept have amply demonstrated his commitment to including the views of all stakeholders in working through these very complicated issues.
The concept that Greg & Judy were developing was broader than just SHARE & CHORUS, however, and when the three of us spoke by phone over the summer we agreed on the necessity of bringing in a data person. We were very fortunate that Laurie Goodman, editor-in-chief of Gigascience, was able to join us.
I've done several sessions like this over the years -- "facilitated conversation". No presentations. Some informal agreement among the participants about the likely themes. I prepare half a dozen or so questions ahead of time, but once we get to the event, I rarely use more than two. With the right people, the conversation flows naturally and takes its own course. My job is just to keep it moving.
With this group, my task was extremely easy and the 45 minutes went by in a flash. Of course we could have gone on much longer, but I'm happy with the range of topics that we were at least able to touch on. (The session was recorded, so there will be a link on the Charleston website at some point).
One of the most striking moments was when Greg asked how many in the audience were involved in managing institutional repositories. Half the people raised a hand. Then he said, "Keep your hands up. Now how many of you are successful in getting your authors to submit directly to your IR?" Only 2 hands were left up and one of the two was wavering in uncertainty.
Reshaping the scholarly communication eco-system is a massive job. As John said, developing achievable policy will require adult deliberations and negotiations among all the key players – universities, libraries, publishers, and government. It is also clear that a focused effort in data access and interpretation, management, and preservation will become increasingly important, and is one of the areas that currently is both most volatile and most challenging.
So in addition to promoting ORCID, noting funding sources, sharing best practices for effective IR management, and a whole host of other things that came up during the session, John suggests getting one of the nifty yellow Data t-shirts like the one Laurie wore. Cafe Press has some nice options.